All projects funded by Nebraska Department of Water, Energy and Environment
Brandon Cervania
NITAC Intern: Brandon Cervania
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Summer Activities
Joined NITAC as an intern this summer. This included being trained to make environmental and cost saving recommendations for manufacturing facilities and collaborated with other interns as well as the directors of NITAC/P3 to work towards learning to become an analyst on manufacturing facility assessments.
Company Background
Five facilities were assessed, across sectors such as rubber components, food processing, municipal wastewater, tape manufacturing, and doors.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Some tangible and intangible benefits to the facilities include a significant reduction in their GHG emissions, improved worker satisfaction, as well as process optimization.
Results
Table 1 below summarizes the pollution prevention impact the recommendations will have if all are implemented.
Recommendation | Annual Energy Savings | Annual GHG Reduction (MTCO2e) | Annual Cost Savings | |
therms/year | kWh/year | |||
Connect Sewer Piping to Storm Drain | – | – | – | $43,542 |
Add Insulation to Preheat Air for the Oven | 609 | – | 3.2 | $609 |
Upgrade Facility Lighting | – | 4,031 | 1.7 | $293 |
Add Insulation for Maintenance Building | 538 | – | 2.9 | $430 |
Chiller Operation Hours Optimization | – | 303,750 | 129 | $9,491 |
Totals | 1,147 | 307,781 | 136.8 | $54,365 |
Juriah Lawson
NITAC Intern: Juriah Lawson
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Recommendations Made and Special Project
Juriah went on a total of five assessments over the summer. The first assessment was at a hospital, followed by a wood processer, tortilla producer, concrete equipment manufacturer, and finally a sand processor. The assessment at the sand processing plant was led by Juriah right before the submission of this report. During these assessments, recommendations were made yielding in potential cost, energy, and greenhouse gas emission savings as shown in Table 1-1. I first found the savings in reducing downtime and reducing equipment failure through implementing new automatic transfer switches. The use of cogged belts for belt-driven supply fans for rooftop AC units was also recommended. Lockout tagout covers were suggested to prevent the inappropriate use of compressed air for cooling bearings. Additionally, two facilities were helped apply for tax exemption on their water and electric bill. Finally, it was recommended that a facility replace their electric heaters with natural gas heaters. An additional measure to insulate hot piping found near some boilers was also suggested.
For the special project, a video to demonstrate how to use and analyze the data gathered from our three-phase power loggers was made.
Assessment Recommendation (AR) | Annual Savings | Capital Investment | Simple Payback (Years) | ||
Resource | GHG | Dollars | |||
Replace Automatic Transfer Switches | – | $2,210/yr | $30,000 | 13.6 years | |
Replace V-Belts with Cogged Belts | 97,680 kWh/yr | 41.5 MTCO2e/yr | $113/yr | $547 | 4.8 years |
Install Lockout Covers on Compressed Air Lines | 118,537 kWh/yr | 50.4 MTCO2e/yr | $5,927/yr | $510 | 0.1 years |
Apply for Water Tax Exemption | – | $366/yr | $120 | 0.3 years | |
Replace Resistance Heaters with Radiant Tube Heaters | 265.9 kW/yr | 50.4 MTCO2e/yr | $7,996/yr | $11,349 | 1.4 years |
Apply for Tax Exemption on Electricity | – | $1,502/yr | $6,250 | 4.2 years | |
Total Sum* | 142.3 MTCO2e/year | $18,114/yr | $48,776 | 2.7 years |
Trent Kisker
NITAC Intern: Trent Kisker
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Overview of Assessments
Had the opportunity to go on assessments to five facilities over the summer. Some of the recommendations included working on shifting equipment use. This allowed for a decrease in the demand of the facility, saving money throughout the year. One of the more technical recommendations that was worked on included heat recovery. One application was relatively simple, figuring out the savings associated with venting heat from an air compressor onto the manufacturing floor to help reduce the heating load during the winter. The other application involved a heat exchanger along with a glycol loop to transfer exhaust heat back into the process. The replacement and upgrading of machinery were also investigated. Other AR’s general included compressed air and deduct meters.
Special Project
Trent’s special project was over the topic of solar energy. These included solar panels, battery storage, facility types, community solar, rebates and incentives, and talking with vendors. With solar panels the different types and how each one might be beneficial to manufacturers were investigated. From research it was determined due to higher efficiency that bi-facial panels allow for the most energy being gathered along with durability. Battery storage is an important aspect of solar energy as the sun isn’t always shining and currently lithium-ion batteries only last for about 4 hours before needing to be recharged. With the introduction of iron-oxide batteries, it could allow for cheaper and longer lasting energy storage. Community solar is a great concept allowing the public to participate in renewable energy without the need to install solar power of their own. However, for manufacturers it doesn’t make much sense due to the additional cost associated with participation as well as not saving any money. Rebates and incentives are going away as solar becomes more common. Another big encouragement of renewable energy is the Investment Tax Credit. Expanded in 2022 it allows for a 30% tax credit on installing solar. However, due to recent passage of a bill in July, this will be dissolved in 2028.
Recommendation | Annual Energy Savings | Annual GHG Reduction | Annual Cost Savings |
Install Deduct Meter in Main Facility | – | $3,352 | |
Fix Distribution Center Deduct Meter | – | $910 | |
Retrofit Burn-In Tester with Regenerative Load | 38,880 kWh | 16.5 MTCO2e | $9,857 |
Stagger Burn-in Testers | – | $2,457 | |
Reduce Compressed Air Leaks in the System | 29,370 kWh | 23.7 MTCO2e | $2,489 |
Replace Vertical Turning Lathe | – | 1.7 MTCO2e | $90,884 |
Total Sum | 68,250 kWh | 41.9 MTCO2e | $109,949 |
Mia Perales
NITAC Intern: Mia Perales
Major: Environmental Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Purpose
The purpose of this project is to provide a summary of the work completed and progress made over the summer on assessments as an analyst and lead student. This includes assessment recommendations at various stages of completion, work specific to lead student requirements, and a special project.
Facility Information
Four assessments were completed this summer, including: Lester Electrical in Lincoln NE, American Wood Fibers in Pella, IA, Mi Mama’s in Omaha, NE, and American Laboratories in Omaha, NE. The assessment at Lester Electrical was completed as the equipment coordinator and one AR for upgraded lighting was completed. The second facility visited was American Wood Fibers, which was assessed as the safety coordinator and two AR’s were completed, one for Venturi Nozzles for Air Dusters and one for replacing V-Belts with Cogged V-Belts. The third facility visited was Mi Mama’s where one AR for Upgrading Dust Collector Valves was completed. The fourth facility visited was American Laboratories, which was assessed as the lead student, which included preliminary research, preparation of presentations, organizing transportation, utility analysis, and writing of the final report as additional responsibilities. For this assessment one AR for HVLS Fan Implementation was completed.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Some intangible benefits to the facilities include a significant reduction in their GHG emissions, improved worker safety and satisfaction, and maintenance optimization. Summarized below in Table 1 are the results of the pollution prevention impact the recommendations will have if all are completed.
Assessment Recommendation | Annual Energy Savings (kWh/year) | Annual GHG Reduction (MTCO2e/year) | Annual Cost Savings ($/year) |
Upgrade Facility Lighting | 211,914 | 90.1 | $20,339 |
Venturi Nozzles for Air Dusters | 16,196 | 13.0 | $793 |
Replace V-Belts with Cogged V-Belts | 12,368 | 5.6 | $1,051 |
Upgrade Dust Collector Valves | 4,752 | 2.1 | $299 |
Install an HVLS Fan | – | $17,877 | |
Total Sum* | 245,230 | 110.8 | $40,060 |
Khanh Le
Analyzed the cost & energy savings from upgrading LED lighting, installing deduct meters, replacing machines, replacing boiler systems, replacing V-belts with cogged V-belts, installing a photocell sensor onto lighting, implementing a compressed air leak detection program, and switching to an electrostatic spray paint gun from a manual spray paint gun.
Nga Pham
NITAC Intern: Nga Pham
Major: Electrical Engineering Undergraduate
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Summer Activities
Joined a diverse team of analysts on a total of 4 assessments with different roles on each: was the lead on one, an analyst on all, and a safety & equipment coordinator for two site visits.
Company Background
Helped assist 4 facilities. These sectors of these four ranged from food processors, rubber components, wood products, and a chemical producer.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Some tangible and intangible benefits to the facilities include a significant reduction in their GHG emissions, improved worker satisfaction, as well as process optimization. A summary of the benefits can be found in table 1.
Recommendation | Annual Cost Savings | Implementation Cost | Payback Period (years) | Annual Energy/Demand Savings | Annual GHG Reduction (MTCO₂e) |
Reduce Air Leaks in the Distribution System | $374 | $500 | 1.3 | 6,740 kWh | 3.1 |
Shift Fire Pump Testing to Off-Peak Time | $3,060 | $90 | <0.1 | 224.4 kW-months/year | – |
Shifting Forklifts Charging Schedule | $15,435 | $450 | <0.1 | 300.7 kW-months/year | |
Thermal Efficiency Improvement Program | $2,087 | $3,960 | 1.9 | 267 GJ | |
Total | $20,956 | $5,000 | 0.9 years | – | 3.1 MTCO₂e |
Budoor Alsaadi
NITAC Intern: Budoor Alsaadi
Major: Ms. in Environmental Engineering
School: University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Summer Activities
Participated in four NIAC assessments during the summer, taking on both analyst and coordinator roles. The first assessment was at an electrical equipment manufacturer, serving as a safety coordinator. The second assessment was at a door manufacturer, serving as the equipment coordinator. The third assessment was at a food processing facility, where Budoor contributed as an analyst. The final assessment was at a pharmaceutical manufacturer, serving as the equipment coordinator.
Recommendations Description
Across all four assessments ARs aimed at cost and energy savings were prepared, including applying for natural-gas tax exemptions and adjusting the air-compressor setpoint. At the second facility, there was a focus on equipment operations, recommending to install horizontal HVLS fans for better air movement and to implement a steel-waste donation program to reduce disposal costs and support reuse. For the food-processing facility, an AR to install an anaerobic digester for energy recovery and an AR to install a boiler-water analyzer and controller to tighten blowdown and chemical control were written. At the pharmaceutical manufacturer, equipment inspections were coordinated and the adjustment of the compressed air setpoint and adding an expansion tank to stabilize supply and cut electricity use were recommended.
Assessment Recommendation (AR) | Annual Savings | Capital Investment | Simple Payback (Years) | ||
Resource | GHG Reduction | Dollars | |||
Apply for Tax Exemptions for Natural Gas | – | $471 | $416 | 0.9 year | |
Adjust the Air Compressor Setpoint | 9,958 kWh | 4.2 | $723 | $26 | 0.04 year |
Steel Scrap Donation | – | $13,580 | $600 | 0.44 year | |
Install Horizontal HVLS Fans | 42,478 kWh | 19.2 | $3,041 | $54,600 | 1.2 year |
Reduce Compressed Air Operating Pressure and Install Storage Tank | 30,081 kWh | 13.6 | $1,715 | $15,825 | OM |
Implement an Anaerobic Digester | 558,735 kWh | 238.4 | $13,968 | OM | OM |
Install a boiler water analyzer and controller | – | 7.14 | $836 | $3,479 | 0.24 year |
Total | 641,252 kWh | 282.54 | $18,651 | $59,121 | 2.38 year |
Florence Blankson
NITAC Intern: Florence Blankson
Major: PhD Civil Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Company Background
Assisted five facilities, including those in sectors ranging from doors, office furniture, chemical production, municipal wastewater, and mineral processing.
Recommendations
A total of five recommendations aimed at improving efficiency and reducing environmental impact were completed while two more are still in progress. These recommendations, if implemented, are projected to yield significant energy and cost savings while also contributing to the reduction of GHG emissions, a summary of which can be found in Table
Assessment Recommendation | Annual Savings | Implementation Cost ($) | Simple Payback (Years) | ||
Resource | GHG Reduction | Dollars | |||
Compressed Air System Management Program | 1,194,410 kWh/year | 508 MTCO2e | $77,140 | – | |
Apply for Tax Exemption on Electricity and Water | – | $6,308 | $4,304 | 0.7 | |
Compressed Air Booster for 130psi Machines | 68,789 kWh/year | 28.9 | $2,339 | $3,448 | 1.5 |
Install Compressor Cool Air Intake | 17,257 kWh/year | 7.3 MTCO2e | $824 | $4,650 | 5.7 |
Upgrade Facility Exit Signs | 944 kWh/year | 0.4 MTCO2e | $407 | $423 | 1.0 |
Total* | 1,281,400 kWh/year | 545 | $87,018 | $12,825 | 0.1 |
Thomas Haar
NITAC Intern: Thomas Haar
Major: B.S. Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Summer Activities
Took part in six assessments this summer with a variety of responsibilities, leading one, contributing as an analyst on all, and stepping in as safety coordinator for one visit and equipment manager for another.
Company Background
Assisted six facilities during this project, each with a unique role in their industries. Bruckman Rubber Company in Hastings, Nebraska, is a top U.S. manufacturer specializing in precision rubber components for automotive and industrial applications. Safco Products produces durable office and educational furnishings, ranging from workstations to storage solutions designed for heavy use. Conagra Brands, a national food processing leader, operates facilities that produce well-known snacks and ready-to-eat meals such as Act II popcorn. American Laboratories, in Omaha, Nebraska, develops and markets enzyme-rich products for food, nutrition, and pharmaceutical sectors. The Columbus Wastewater Treatment Plant serves the local community by treating and recycling wastewater to protect public health and the environment. Finally, FLEXcon, a global company with a plant in Columbus, manufactures adhesive films and coatings used across industrial and consumer markets.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Across these diverse operations, pollution prevention efforts should result in significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, streamlined processes, and improved operational efficiency, reinforcing both environmental responsibility and business performance. Table 1 below summarizes the impact on pollution prevention that my recommendations will have if all are implemented.
AR | Annual Energy Savings (kWh) | Annual GHG Reductions (MTCO2e) | Annual Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|
Upgrade Facility Lighting to LEDS | 39,787 | 18.0 | $3,980 |
Implement Occupancy Sensors | 29,016 | 13.1 | $2,092 |
Replace Inefficient Shrink Wrapper | 33,418 | 14.0 | $6,723 |
Implement Compressed Air Blowoff Alternative | 3,513 | 1.5 | $111 |
Repair Compressed Air Leaks | 63,420 | 26.4 | $2,905 |
Implement Demand Management | – | $628 | |
Total Sum | 169,154 | 73 | $16,439 |
Carsen Nelson
Analyzed the cost & energy savings from upgrading to LED lighting for normal lighting and exit signs, applying for tax exemption, installing VFDs on air compressors, repairing compressed air leaks, replacing v-belts with cogged belts, and installing a cool air intake on an air compressor.
Ashkan Asadi
NITAC Intern: Ashkan Asadish
Major: ArchitecturalEngineering
School: University of Nebraska – Lincoln
Summer Activities
Worked with the NITAC in Summer 2025, conducting on-site energy assessments for five industrial facilities. The work involved field data collection, staff interviews, utility analysis, engineering calculations, vendor outreach, and preparation of Assessment Recommendations (ARs) and Other Measures (OMs). The sectors assessed included healthcare, food processing, office furniture, and mineral processing.
Cost and Energy Benefits
The ARs and OMs together have the potential to deliver annual savings of 403,862 kWh of electricity, 48,402 therms of natural gas, and $278,192 in costs, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 197.3 MTCO2e. The following Table 1 summarize the savings for all ARs and OMs:
AR/OM Name | Energy Savings (kWh/year) | GHG Emission Reduction (MTCO2e/year) | Cost Savings | Impl. Cost | Simple Payback |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Install Feedlot Sensors for Old Economizers | 6,948 | 3.2 | $379 | $1,435 | 3.8 |
Replace Old Rooftop Units | 24,424 | 11.4 | $1,343 | $62,748 | 46.7 |
Reduce Compressed Air Leaks in the Distribution System | 108,360 | 45.5 | $2,976 | $3,500 | 1.2 |
Replace V-Belts in Mixer with Cogged Belts | 956 | 0.4 | $90 | $260 | 2.9 |
Installing Variable Frequency Drive on Bakery Mixer Motor | 8,670 | 3.9 | $546 | $7,580 | 13.8 |
Leaking Jacketed Tank Replacement | 3,864 | 1.8 | $6,403 | $400,000 | >50 |
Implementing a Steam Trap Maintenance Program | – | 25.7 | $25,169 | $25,169 | 0.1 |
Reduce Compressed Air Leaks in the Distribution System | 247,940 | 105.4 | $10,406 | $9,000 | 0.9 |
Replace Screw Conveyor with Belt Conveyor for Sand Handling | – | $230,880 | $214,000 | 0.9 | |
Totals | 403,862 | 197.3 | $278,192 | $723,692 | 2.6 Years |
Seth Pennell
NITAC Intern: Seth Pennell
Major: Electrical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska – Lincoln
Summer Activities
This summer, 5 NITAC assessments, one of which was as the lead student. The goal was to write recommendations that save energy and/or money for the client. For each assessment attended not as the lead, one or two assessment recommendations (ARs) or other measures (OMs) were written.
Topics
Prepared ARs and OMs covered the following topics: installation of occupancy sensors, repair compressed air leaks, installation of recuperator for a burn-off oven, replacement of V-belts with cogged belts, installation of VFDs for compressors, and delay of startup time. A special report was written about a company’s product which claims to reduce energy usage by filtering ground and neutral harmonics, concluding that the product is likely illegitimate. If companies or assessment leads believe that power quality is an issue, it was noted that professional power quality audits are a better option than using the product analyzed.
Lead Report Savings
In the report for the lead assessment, the potential annual savings from measures recommended are: 167 gal of oil, 165 gal of paint, 279,000 kWh, 851.1 kW-months, 9,932 therms of natural gas, 64.8 MTCO2e (metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent), and $111,211.
Individual Recommendation Savings
Individual AR | Energy Savings | GHG Reduction | Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|
Replace V-Belts with Cogged Belts | 3,560 kWh/year | 1.5 MTCO2e/year | $341/year |
Repair Compressed Air Leaks | 418 kWh/year | 0.2 MTCO2e/year | $23/year |
Install Occupancy Sensors | 3,137 kWh/year | 1.3 MTCO2e/year | $279/year |
Delay Startup Time | 5,896 kWh/year | 2.5 MTCO2e/year | $354/year |
Total | 13,011 kWh/year | 5.5 MTCO2e/year | $997/year |
Projects funded by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency P3 program
Aiden Gnuse
Intern: Aiden Gnuse
Degrees: BS Biochemistry, BS Microbiology
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Greater Omaha Packing (GOP) is a large beef packing plant located at 3001 L Street in Omaha, Nebraska. Since 1920, GOP has been committed to providing high quality, legendary beef products, industry leadership, and continued improvement. The facility processes on average 2,400 cattle each day and ships to every US state and over seventy different countries. They are recognized as a global business leader in the beef industry and strive to be innovative in sustainability throughout the facility.
Project Description
The primary objective of these projects is to assist in Greater Omaha’s ongoing goals of improving energy efficiency and reducing the environmental impacts of their systems. As a meat processing facility, Greater Omaha generates wastewater and is involved in wastewater management. A key step in this process involves the use of sulfuric acid to neutralize the caustic soda used to treat wastewater, which can be optimized by bulk containment of the acid and potentially looking at alternatives to sulfuric acid that further reduce environmental impacts such as carbon dioxide neutralization. Furthermore, rerouting expelled cold air in roof vents to instead cool pumphouses in the summer was investigated for energy efficiency and indirect benefits.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Pollution prevention benefits were assessed and given as pollution prevention (P2) recommendations that reduce utility usage, such as electricity. A summary of the utility and source material energy savings, the associated cost savings, and the payback period of each pollution prevention recommendation is listed in Table 1.
P2 Recommendation | Electricity Savings | Materials Reduced | GHG Emissions Reduced | Annual Cost Savings | Payback Period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repair Compressed Air Leaks | 51416 kWh/yr | – | 23.93 MTCO2e/yr | $4,473/yr | 0.4 |
Switch from IBC to Bulk Chemical Containers | – | 1430 IBCs/yr | 138.74 MTCO2e/yr | $480,282/yr | 1.6 |
Use Boiler Flue Gas to Neutralize Wastewater pH | – | 89.04 US Tons H2SO4/yr | 5.09 MTCO2/yr | $60,548/yr | – |
David Karpf
Industrial Placement Intern: David Karpf
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Station: Nebraska Nitrogen, Geneva, Nebraska
Company Background
Nebraska Nitrogen is a vital manufacturer of anhydrous ammonia fertilizer located in Geneva, Nebraska. The team of 34 employees is dedicated to supporting agricultural needs via the production of this fertilizer. Ammonia plays a crucial role in maintaining soil fertility and promoting crop production, ultimately benefiting the farmers and the consumers of the product. With daily production capacity that can reach upwards of 100 tons and storage capabilities of 20,000 tons, Nebraska Nitrogen is paramount in supporting local agriculture sustainability.
Project Description
Anhydrous ammonia synthesis requires high pressures. To bring the product down to a more manageable state, the product goes through a condenser and through a series of pressure letdown drums. In the letdown drums, gaseous ammonia vents off (along with other gases) and is currently sent to the process flare. Ideally, systems are in place to recover and recycle the ammonia from the letdown purge. Recycling the ammonia allows for reforming and the remaining purge gas has the potential to supplement natural gas use in a plant reactor. However, the current system has a design flaw and is not in use. Thus, the project was to investigate the requirements to bring the ammonia purge recovery system back online and to identify the potential savings for implementing this project.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Recovering the ammonia in the purge gas would lead to a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. The ammonia recovered would be reformed making hydrogen, reducing the amount of fresh natural gas needed in the steam-methane reforming process to make new hydrogen. Additionally, the remaining gases in the purge gas could be burned in the reformer, reducing the BTU requirement from natural gas needed to maintain production and thus reducing emissions related to burning this natural gas.
Results
Implementation of the project was not completed, but significant progress was completed to streamline future implementation. If implemented, the plant could expect to see savings detailed in Table 1.
Annual Energy Savings | GHG Reductions | Annual Cost Savings | Implementation Cost | Simple Payback |
52,040 MMBTU/year | 2,623 MTCO2e | $98,355/year | $68,947 | 0.70 years |
Carson Nichols
NITAC Intern: Carsen Nelson
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska – Lincoln
Summer Activities:
Participated in 4 NITAC assessments, with a leading role on the second, a metal door manufacturer. The first assessment was at a community hospital. The third assessment was at a food manufacturing plant. The fourth and final assessment was at a concrete machine manufacturing facility.
Recommendations Descriptions:
On the first assessment, an AR for upgrading the facility’s lighting to LEDs was written, as well as an OM for upgrading the facility’s exit signs to LEDs. For the lead assessment, an AR was prepared suggesting the facility apply for tax exemptions where they are qualified to save extra annual costs. For the third assessment, an AR was written suggesting that the facility set up a compressed air management plan to detect and repair any leaks in the system. An AR was also written suggesting the facility install VFDs on their compressors to save on usage costs. For the fourth and final assessment, an AR was written suggesting the facility replace their v-belts with cogged v-belts and a suggestion that they install a cool air intake on their compressor. The recommendations are listed chronologically below in Table 1-1.
Assessment Recommendation (AR) | Annual Savings | Capital Investment | Simple Payback (years) | ||
Resource (unit/yr) | GHG Reduction (MTCO2e/yr) | Cost ($/yr) | |||
Upgrade Facility Lighting | 4,916 kWh/yr | 4.7 | $443 | $783 | 1.8 years |
Upgrade Facility Exit Signs | 1,253 kWh/yr | 1.2 | $93 | $320 | 3.4 years |
Apply for Tax Exemption when Qualified | – | $5,745 | $2,300 | 0.4 years | |
Reduce Air Leaks in the Distribution System | 52,020 kWh/yr | 22.2 | $2,953 | $600 | 0.2 years |
Install VFD on Compressed Air System | 147,540 kWh/yr | 62.9 | $12,629 | $11,440 | 0.9 years |
Replace V-Belts with Cogged V-Belts | 3,424 kWh/yr | 1.5 | $274 | $1,558 | 5.7 years |
Using Cool Air Intake for Compressor | 8,010 kWh/yr | 3.4 | $481 | $1,785 | 3.7 years |
Totals | 217,163 kWh/yr | 95.9 | $22,618 | $18,786 | 0.8 years |