Projects funded by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency P3 program
Caleb Preister
Intern: Caleb Preister
Major: Biological Systems Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background:
Trenton Agri Products, LLC (TAP):
This 20-year-old ethanol plant in Hitchcock County produces 48 million gallons of ethanol every year along with hundreds of thousands of tons of wet distillers’ grain and many tons of corn oil. It employs about 35 people in the area and gives an alternative market to local corn producers as well as providing livestock producers with a cheap source of livestock feed.
Project Description:
Trenton Agri Products is committed to continued growth and excellence in everything that they do. This includes their impact on the environment and usage of water and energy. This site analysis was conducted at the request of the Vice President of Operations. The analysis was done over the course of June 3rd – August 16th. The objective was to find ways to increase the plant’s efficiency and lower its negative impacts on the environment, namely GHG emissions.
Pollution Prevention Benefits:
Several pollution prevention ideas were thought about, some were investigated, and 3 were suggested. These suggestions, or Assessment Recommendations (ARs), are putting slurry strainer material into the wet cake, buying another RO machine, and moving the cooling loop water filter. They vary in implementation cost, GHG reductions, and operational cost/savings. The estimated pollution prevention benefits from this project can be found in Table 1 below if all suggestions are implemented.
P2 Category | Annual Cost Savings | Annual Usage Reductions |
---|---|---|
Grain Source-Reduction | $1,650 | 25 tons |
Electricity & Natural Gas | – | – |
Carbon Dioxide Equivalent | $32,300 | 50+ MT CO2e |
Total | $33,950 | 75+ tons of mixed materials |
Linh Hua
Project Overview
Industrial Placement Intern: Linh Hua
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Nebraska Nitrogen is a leading manufacturer of anhydrous ammonia fertilizer, strategically located in Geneva, Nebraska. Our team of 36 dedicated professionals is committed to supporting the agricultural needs of the Western Cornbelt farmers. We pride ourselves on delivering high-quality fertilizer solutions that play a crucial role in maintaining soil fertility and promoting optimal crop production. With a daily production capacity of around 100 tons and a storage capacity reaching 20,000 tons, we are well-equipped to meet the region's agricultural demands.
Project Description
Nebraska Nitrogen is focused on reducing the volume of oily wastewater generated by their piston compressor system to improve management practices and lower the costs associated with off-site disposal. The project seeks cost-effective alternatives to the current expensive off-site disposal method. Potential solutions include chemical treatments, oil recycling, filtration, distillation, and water reduction strategies. It is necessary to investigate these options, conduct bench trials, and provide a detailed report with recommendations. If successful, a preliminary design for a full-scale trial will be developed.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Pollution Prevention is one of top priorities in Nebraska Nitrogen. Implementing an effective treatment solution for the emulsified oil and water waste from Nebraska Nitrogen’s piston compressor will provide significant pollution prevention benefits. By reducing the volume of wastewater requiring off-site disposal, the plant will decrease its environmental footprint and lower associated costs. Utilizing advanced chemical treatments, recycling methods, or filtration techniques can lead to more sustainable operations by minimizing waste generation and enhancing resource recovery. These improvements not only benefit the environment but also support the plant’s economic efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Results
The projects at Nebraska Nitrogen were successful, leading to substantial cost savings, potential increases in production rates, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The specific savings are detailed in Table 1.
Annual Volume Savings | GHG Reductions | Annual Cost Savings | Implementation Cost | Simple Payback |
---|---|---|---|---|
28,350 | 0.225 | $35,000 | $15,000 | 0.43 |
Additional indirect or intangible benefits include:
- Reducing the amount of hazardous waste lowers the risk of environmental accidents and associated liabilities.
- Potential for long-term cost savings in other areas through process optimization
- Improved operational efficiency and potential for increased productivity
Olivia Farmen
Project Overview
Intern: Olivia Farmen
Major: Biological Systems Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Zoetis is the largest animal healthcare company globally and has pledged to become carbon neutral in their operations by 2030. Zoetis also launched the Driven to Care initiative in 2021, which formalizes their commitments to the pillars of communities, animals, and planet. As the largest of Zoetis’s manufacturing sites, the Lincoln, NE location produces vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and diagnostics and is motivated to explore sustainability projects.
Project Description
Throughout the summer of 2024, several cost saving and pollution prevention opportunities were explored for Zoetis in Lincoln, NE as part of the Partners in Pollution Prevention program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The goals of the summer projects include improving energy efficiency for the site, proposing cost savings for recyclable materials, and offsetting natural gas usage.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Three sustainability projects were explored due to their pollution prevention benefits. The first was performing an assessment of the compressed air lines in the facility. It was recommended that Zoetis purchase an ultrasonic leak detector to facilitate identification and repair of leaks. This will increase the energy efficiency of the site. The second assessment recommendation was for a second cardboard baler to be purchased. By increasing the amount of cardboard baled, the site will reduce freight emissions and increase the rebate value for recycled cardboard. Finally, a renewable natural gas offset program (Green Forward) that would provide greenhouse gas savings for the company was researched and proposed.
Results
The pollution prevention benefits and results for each project are summarized in Table 11.
Project | Cost Savings | Tangible Benefits | Other Benefits (GHG) |
---|---|---|---|
Compressed Air Leak Detection and Repair | $23,340/year | 495,200 kWh/year saved | 346 MTCO2e emissions avoided |
Cardboard Baler | $16,000/year | 14 fewer recycling truckloads/year | 1 MTCO2e emissions avoided |
RNG Offsets: | NA | 56,000 therms/year offset | 297 MTCO2e emissions avoided |
Total | $39,340/year | --- | 644 MTCO2e |
Zach Firmature
Project Overview
Intern: Zach Firmature
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Smithfield Foods, founded in 1936 in Smithfield, Virginia, is a global food company and the world's largest pork processor and hog producer. Employing over 55,000 people and generating revenue exceeding $29 billion, Smithfield continues to expand both domestically and internationally. The company is known for its commitment to quality, innovation, and sustainability, producing a wide range of pork products, including fresh pork, bacon, ham, and sausage. Smithfield Omaha, one of its key facilities, is a cooking and packaging plant that specializes in producing salami, pepperoni, and other dried meats. At this facility, unprocessed pork is ground, baked, cured, and packaged, with over 200 employees producing around one million pounds of product each week. Since 2013, Smithfield Foods has been a subsidiary of WH Group, a leading global pork company based in China.
Project Description
During the summer of 2024, as a Partners in Pollution Prevention intern at Smithfield Omaha, Zach Firmature focused on reducing waste and improving energy efficiency across the facility. The key areas of emphasis included optimizing the dry room HVAC system, enhancing energy efficiency, and reducing overall utility consumption. My recommendations aimed to refine existing operations, cut costs, and promote sustainable practices within the facility.
Results
The pollution prevention benefits and results for each project are summarized in Table 11.
Recommendations | Annual Tangible/Material Benefits | Annual Cost Savings | Payback |
---|---|---|---|
Rooms | 1,776,334 kWh | $79,939 | 0.31 years |
Integrating Smart Devices into HVAC System | 1,198,680 kWh | $53,933 | 0.48 years |
Reducing Meat Giveaways | 474,500 lbs Meat | $1,660,750 | 1 day |
Total | $1,794,622 | ||
Total GHG Emission Reduction | 4.7 GtCO2e |
Micah Moore
Project Overview
P3/NIAC Intern: Micah Moore
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background:
Throughout the summer, I participated in both IAC and P3 assessments. During my time working for the IAC, I participated in three different assessments. When I was not working with the IAC, I traveled to an ethanol facility in Western Nebraska. Midwest Renewable Energy (MRE) is a dry-mill fuel ethanol plant that started in 2004. The plant was started by a small team of investors and has been a staple of both the Sutherland and North Platte communities. They produce fuels and high-grade alcohols for various applications.
Project Description:
Throughout the summer of 2024, Micah Moore, an intern from the P3 program of UNL, worked on a pollution prevention project for the company. The primary goal was to evaluate Midwest Renewable Energy's (MRE) scrubber operations to identify potential cost savings in chemical usage and air treatment. This involves exploring both manual and automated solutions to reduce the feed rate of chemicals, thus minimizing operational costs without compromising efficiency.
Pollution Prevention Benefits:
Several pollution prevention suggestions were made that could reduce chemical usage, water usage, natural gas usage, and electricity usage in the facilities. These recommendations not only aim to minimize environmental impact but also offer potential cost savings and operational improvements. By implementing measures such as optimizing chemical dosing, improving water efficiency, and enhancing energy management, the facilities can achieve significant reductions in waste and emissions, contributing to a more sustainable and responsible operation. Additionally, these efforts can lead to improved compliance with environmental regulations, reduced liability, and an overall enhancement of the facilities' environmental stewardship.
Results:
By implementing facility improvement measures to a variety of clients, the combined energy savings and avoided waste for projects and assessments are mentioned in this report are shown below in Table 1.
P2/E2 Category | Annual Cost Savings | Waste/Energy Reduced | GHG Reduced |
---|---|---|---|
Install PID feedback loop | $1,040 | 3,714 pounds/year | NA |
Install Level Controller | $2,381 | 10,588 kWh | 10.2 |
Steam Condensate Return | $45,700 | 4,181 MMBTU/year | 222 |
Insulate Devices and Reduce Heat Losses | $5,438 | 544 GJ/year | 27 |
Total | $54,559 | - | 259.2 |
Projects funded by a grant from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy (NDEE) program
Luke Papa
Project Overview
Intern: Luke Papa
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Greater Omaha Packing (GOP) is a beef packing plant based off 3001 L Street in Omaha, Nebraska. Since its inception in 1920, GOP has been committed to providing high quality products and continued improvement. The facility processes on average 2,400 cattle each day and ships to over 70 other countries along with every US state. They are recognized as a global business leader in the beef industry and strive to improve in sustainability throughout the facility.
Project Description
The maintenance department at Greater Omaha Packing sought assistance in 2024 with their systems and processes to increase energy efficiency and implement pollution prevention methods. Installation of a heat exchanger for the wastewater and hydraulic systems was investigated along with a compressed air leak assessment throughout the plant.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Pollution prevention benefits were assessed, and recommendations were made to reduce water, natural gas, and electricity usage within the facility. For each recommendation, annual cost savings and implementation costs were calculated, along with payback periods. The environmental impact, in terms of greenhouse gas reduction, was also evaluated. Additionally, potential soft savings for each recommendation were analyzed.
Results
The pollution prevention benefits and results for each project are summarized in Table 11.
Project | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Cost Savings | GHG Reduced | Payback Period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wastewater Heat Exchanger | NA | 22,200 MMBtu | $56,000 | 1,182 MTCO2E | 2.7 years |
Hydraulic and Garage Tank Cooling | NA | 25,600 MMBtu | $69,000 | 1,359 MTCO2E | 2.2 years |
Compressed Air | 453,000 kWh | NA | $19,000 | 275 MTCO2E | 1.1 years |
Total | 453,000 kWh | 47,800 MMBtu | $144,000 | 2,816 MTCO2E | - |
Ryan Tolliver
Project Overview
P3 Intern: Ryan Tolliver
Major: Mechanical Engineering
Station: Geneva, Nebraska
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Nebraska Nitrogen is an anhydrous ammonia fertilizer manufacturing facility in Geneva, Nebraska that employs 35 people. With a storage capacity of up to 20,000 tons, this facility produces around 100 tons of ammonia each day. This ammonia is sold to farmers to supply nitrogen to their soil, promoting the crop growth that is needed to sustain our modern world.
Project Description
The biggest failure point in the production stream is the Worthington Multi Stage Compressor. The heart of the process, this compressor increases the pressure of process streams to the levels that are required for ammonia production. It is over 50 years old and causes the plant to shut down around 5 – 10 times every year. Reducing the number of unintended shutdowns would save hundreds of thousands of dollars each. The main portion of this project involved the creation of a database to analytically identify failure points to reduce the number of shutdowns.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Each time the plant shuts down because of the back end of the process (everything at or after the compressor), the front end (everything before the compressor) is kept running at 35% capacity. This is to prevent damage caused by large temperature changes experienced by the primary reformer during a full shutdown, given that it requires high temperatures to work. The process gas that is created by the front end during shut down is then sent directly to the flare. This releases a significant amount of greenhouse gases as well as other pollutants into the air, presenting a major pollution prevention opportunity.
Results
The main project undertaken, being incredibly ambitious, was unable to be finished during this summer; however, great progress was made towards that end. The pipe replacement project was successfully planned and resulted in significant cost savings, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and the elimination of dangerous safety concerns.
Annual Energy Savings | GHG Reductions | Annual Cost Savings | Implementation Cost | Simple Payback |
---|---|---|---|---|
25,725 MMBTU/year | 2,013 MTCO2e | $1,675,915/year | $36,680 | 0.02 years |
James John Wiltgen
Project Overview
P3: James John Wiltgen
Major: Chemical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
In 1957, the McCain siblings, namely Wallace, Harrison, Robert, and Andrew, established McCain Foods, a company focusing on the production of appetizers. Currently, McCain Foods has a global presence, with sales in over 160 countries. At the McCain Grand Island site, more than 500 employees work diligently to produce a daily output of over 400,000 pounds of appetizers, predominantly onion rings. This facility caters to different clients, ranging from Burger King to Freddy’s, by manufacturing a diverse range of onion ring varieties.
Project Description
In the summer of 2024, McCain took on John Wiltgen from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Partners in Pollution Prevention Program (P3) as an intern to assist them in reducing costs. The primary focus was to minimize wastewater surcharges by optimizing the wastewater process while the secondary focus was to reduce utilities use.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
The goal for the summer was to find the optimal coagulant and flocculant dosage, reduce wastewater bill surcharges, and optimize wastewater treatment. One of the recommendations requires a capital cost, but it has a payback period of only 3 days.
Results
The pollution prevention (P2) benefits are summarized in Table 1.
P2 Category | Annual Savings | Implementation Cost | Payback Period | P2 Benefits (per year reduction) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dry Pick Up | $58,000 | - | - | - |
Swap Out Caustic Soda | $200,630 | $1,825 | 3 days | 144,320 kg CO2 reduced |
Total | $258,630 | $1,825 | 3 days | 144,320 kg CO2 reduced |
Projects funded by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Justice program
Ehsan Nikfarjam
Project Overview
This summer was an exciting and transformative experience as I immersed myself in the Pollution Prevention course and engaged in several on-site assessments through the Nebraska Industrial Training and Assessment Center (NITAC). The course provided me with essential knowledge in energy efficiency and industrial process optimization, complemented by valuable insights from industry professionals.
During the summer, I was involved in four key assessment visits:
Evonik
At Evonik, I focused on tackling energy losses by addressing compressed air leaks and enhancing insulation in key areas. Implementing these recommendations could lead to impressive savings of 2.8 million kWh and 544 GJ annually, amounting to $200,438 in cost reductions.
Bobcat Assembly, Rogers, Minnesota
At the Bobcat Assembly plant, I concentrated on optimizing the compressed air system. By reducing air leaks and lowering the compressor setpoint pressure, I identified potential savings of around 200,000 kWh per year, which would significantly reduce energy costs and extend the lifespan of critical equipment.
Seward Memorial Hospital, Seward, Nebraska
At Seward Memorial Hospital, I analyzed replacing the steam boiler with dedicated systems for humidification and sterilization. This recommendation not only reduces natural gas and electricity consumption but also offers the hospital $23,240 in annual savings with a payback period of just 1.7 years.
Kraft Heinz, Mason City, Iowa
At Kraft Heinz, I studied optimizing their compressed air system by lowering the compressor setpoint pressure and utilizing waste heat to preheat RO feed water. These adjustments are projected to save more than 163,160 kWh annually, delivering substantial energy and cost benefits.
Special Project
In addition to the assessments, I worked on a special project creating an instructional video on detecting compressed air leaks using the Fluke ii900 Industrial Acoustic Imager. The video explains what compressed air leaks are, why they matter, and how to use the Fluke ii900 to find and measure leaks. The goal is to help industries reduce energy waste and operational costs by effectively identifying and fixing leaks.
Projects funded by a grant from Industrial Training and Assessment Center (ITAC)
Anuoluwapo Adeyemo
Project Overview
Nebraska Industrial Assessment Center Intern: Anuoluwapo Adeyemo
Major: Architectural Engineering
School: University of Nebraska- Lincoln
Summer Activities
During the summer I was assigned to 4 facilities assessment. My roles in these visits were analyst (2 assessments), safety coordinator and equipment coordinator for one of the visits. The background of these facilities ranged from industrial products to food products down to health care. Three of the facilities were based in Nebraska while one was based in Minnesota. The industrial facility specialized in manufacturing of precision-forged and machined engine valves and gears. The food product facility specialized in the manufacturing of containers for canned foods like spam. Lastly, the health care facilities are hospitals whose specialty is in health care.
Recommendations Description
For these assessments, I worked on preparation of several Ars such as install HVLS fans, new destination for MUD,upgrade exit signs, upgrade facility lighting, brine reclamation system, deduct meter on irrigation, replace steam boilers with water heater. While for one of the health care assessment I worked on putting data to the good practices that the was already observing some of these good Practices included facility having a private well for irrigation and all facilities lighting already been converted to LEDs.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Implementing Action Recommendations (ARs) can enhance the energy efficiency of assessed facilities, leading to reductions in overall energy use. This, in turn, helps decrease emissions, including greenhouse gases, and contributes to pollution prevention.
Results
The specific benefits of the ARs in terms of pollution prevention are outlined in Table 1.
AR | Annual Energy Savings (kWh/year) | Annual Cost Savings ($/year) | GHG Emission Reduction (MTCO2E/year) |
---|---|---|---|
New Destination for MUD | - | $98,059/ year | - |
Install HVLS Fans | 38,724 | $26,439/ year | 17.5 |
Ugrade Facility lighting | 124,857 | $11,885/ year | 53 |
Upgrade Facility Exit Signs | 1,576 | $364/ year | 0.7 |
Brine Reclamation System | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Deduct Meter on Irrigation | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Replace steam boilers with Water Heater | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Total | 165,157 | $136,747/year | 71.17 |
Kael Frank
Project Overview
NIAC Intern: Kael Frank
Major: Environmental Engineering
School: University of Nebraska at Lincoln
Summer Tasks
During the summer, I participated in 3 NIAC assessments. The first assessment was a forklift cab assembler where I was tasked with forklift charging optimization. The second assessment was at a metal can and lid manufacturer in which I found a use for HVLS fans. As well as another forklift charging optimization recommendation. The last assessment was at an animal feed manufacturer where I did a thorough calculation of heat losses in the facility.
Recommendations Description
The first recommendation regards forklift charging optimization at a forklift cab assembly facility. It was recommended that the charging strategy be changed to off-peak hours to reduce electric demand. Secondly, HVLS fans were recommended at a metal can manufacturer, for better cooling/heating in the facility and to allow removal of personal fans. The third recommendation followed the same off-peak forklift charging strategy as the first recommendation, but at a different facility. Finally, an insulation recommendation was written for various heat generation devices at a black manufacturer.
Allen Minta
Project Overview
Nebraska Industrial Assessment Center Intern: Allen Minta
Major: MS Environmental Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Summer Activities
This summer, I joined a diverse team of analysts on a total of 4 assessments with different roles on each: I was the lead on one, an analyst on all, and also doubled as a safety & equipment coordinator for 2 site visits.
Company Background
I assisted 4 facilities: Evonik Industries, American Wood Fibers, Cargill and Kraft Heinz. Evonik is one of the world’s leading specialty chemical companies. Situated in Blair, NE, this facility produces food and animal feed, and has also made many forays into the biotechnology and chemical industry. Evonik conducts research and development for its customers to improve their products. American Wood Fibers is an industry leader in the manufacture of wood products such as premium wood pellets and wood shavings. The facility is located in Clarks, NE but unfortunately has since been sold. Cargill provides food, ingredients, and industrial products to a diverse clientele. Cargill’s businesses also delivers solutions to bioindustrial customers. Kraft Heinz is a global food and beverage company with products ranging from cheese, meats, beverages, ketchup etc. Their brands include Kraft, Jell-O etc. Their plant is located in Mason City, IA.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Some tangible and intangible benefits to the facilities include a significant reduction in their GHG emissions, improved worker satisfaction, as well as process optimization.
Results
The table below summarizes the pollution prevention impact my recommendations will have if all are implemented.
AR | Annual Energy Savings (kWh/year) | Annual GHG Reduction (MTCO2e) | Annual Cost Savings($/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Install a Capacitor Bank to Improve Power Factor | – | – | $570,000 |
Upgrade Facility Lighting | 6,823 kWh | 3.1 | $730 |
Replacing Old & Worn-out Dock Seals | – | – | $8,000 |
Service the Air Dryer System | 6,216 kWh | 2.8 | $310 |
Install Photocell on Outdoor Lighting | 4,894 kWh | 2.2 | $200 |
Total Sum | 17,933 kWh | 8.1 | $579,240 |
German Murcia-Martinez
Project Overview
P3/NIAC Intern: German Murcia-Martinez
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
Throughout the summer, I participated in both ITAC and a P3 assessment. During my time with the ITAC, I participated in four different assessments, one of which I was the lead student. When I was not working with the ITAC, I was researching and compiling a report for Cargill Protein. Cargill Protein is a meat processer specializing in ground beef products. The plant has 411 employees. With all their products, Cargill Protein strives to deliver the highest quality to its customers.
Project Description
Throughout the summer of 2024, German Murcia-Martinez, an intern from the P3 program of UNL, worked on several pollution prevention projects for several companies. Some of the goals of the summer projects were to increase sustainability by reducing water use, natural gas use, and energy consumption on-site.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Several pollution prevention suggestions were made that could reduce the electricity use, water usage, and natural gas usage in the plant, primarily on the production side. Some of these recommendations have little investment in the reduction of these measures. Some of the recommendations may have a high upfront cost.
Results
The estimated savings and pollution prevention benefits can be found in Table 1 below.
P2/E2 Category | Annual Cost Savings | Waste Eliminated | GHG Reduced (MTCO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Reducing Compressed Air Leaks | $25,385 | 634,637 kWh | 277 |
Installing Steam Condensate Return | $45,700 | 4,181 MMBTU | 222 |
Replacing Dock Seals | $8,000 | - | - |
Installing Deduct Meter | $21,370 | 2,880,000 gallons | - |
Installing Cool Air Intake | $3,000 | 37,000 kWh | 25 |
ITAC Assessments | $32,330 | 62,000 kWh | 47 |
Total | $135,785 | - | 571 |
Mohsen Nikfarjam
Project Overview
This summer, I had the privilege of participating in the Pollution Prevention course and taking part in several hands-on assessments with the Nebraska Industrial Training and Assessment Center (NITAC). The course provided me with a solid foundation in energy efficiency and industrial process improvements, complemented by insights from industry experts.
Throughout the summer, I contributed to four key assessments, where I had the chance to apply my knowledge and make a tangible impact:
American Wood Fibers
At American Wood Fibers, I focused on making the compressed air system more efficient. This involved finding and fixing air leaks, servicing the air dryer, and recommending the switch from standard V-belts to cogged V-belts. The goal of these recommendations was to improve system performance, save energy, and extend the life of the equipment.
Silgan Containers
At Silgan Containers, I worked on implementing a compressed air management plan to optimize air usage. In addition, I identified opportunities to reduce compressed air leaks and recover waste heat from the catalytic oxidizer. These recommendations will help the facility to improve overall energy efficiency and reduce operational costs.
Rise Building Products
For Rise Building Products, I helped with applying for a tax exemption to reduce their operational costs. This involved understanding the financial benefits of tax exemptions and how they can help the company save money while being more sustainable.
CHI Health Schuyler
At CHI Health Schuyler, I worked on improving the facility’s energy efficiency by upgrading the lighting, and exit signs, and installing occupancy sensors. These upgrades not only save energy but also make the facility safer and more efficient.
Special Project
This summer, I worked on creating two short instructional videos. The first video explains how switching from standard V-belts to cogged V-belts in machinery can save energy and reduce costs. The second video focuses on utility bill analysis, showing how reviewing bills can help facilities find hidden savings. Both videos aim to make energy efficiency improvements simple and practical for industrial settings.
Jordon Sanford
Project Overview
NIAC Intern: Jordon Sanford
Major: Civil Engineering
School: University of Nebraska at Lincoln
Summer Activities
During the Summer, I participated in 5 NIAC assessments with a leading role on the fourth. The first assessment was at a
brewery. The second assessment was at a wood processing plant, during which I was the equipment coordinator. My third
assessment was at a vehicle assembly facility. For my leading assessment, we visited a siding manufacture, for which I wrote the report. My fifth and final assessment was at a food manufacturer.
Recommendations Description
On my first assessment, I wrote an AR on the most efficient way the facility could convert their electricity source to solar power, for which I recommended the facility purchase shares in their city’s solar farm. For the second assessment, I wrote a recommendation for the facility to implement a CHP (combined heating and power) system to their incinerator, significantly reducing their energy bills. On third assessment, I suggested that the facility replace their non- LED lights to LEDs to save on energy usage. On my lead assessment, I wrote two AR’s. One was over reducing the set point of the facilities air compressors, and the other was on implementing a compressed air management plan. For my fifth and final assessment, I wrote an AR about installing economizers on the facilities boilers.
The Recommendations are listed below in Table 1; they are organized chronologically.
Assessment Recommendation (AR) | Annual Savings | Capital Investment | Simple Payback (Years) | ||
Resource (Unit/year) | GHG Reduction (MTCO2e/year) | Dollars ($/year) | |||
AR No. 1: Purchase Solar Shares | – | 92 | $6,300 | $890 | 0.1 years |
AR No. 2: Implement CHP System | 1,024,000 kWh | 988 | $82,000 | $568,000 | 7.8 years |
AR No. 3: Replace non- LED Lights and Exit Signs | 8,796 kWh | 6 | $962 | $373 | 0.4 years |
AR No. 4: Implement Compressed Air Management Plan | 199,582 kWh | 135 | $19,137 | $3,000 | 0.2 years |
AR No. 5: Reduce Air Compressor Set Point | 6,208 kWh | 4 | $1,527 | $120 | 0.1 years |
AR No. 6: Install Economizers on Boilers | 265,016 therms | 140 | $103,356 | – | Years |
Totals | 1,238,586 kWh 265,016 therms | 1,365 MTCO2e | $213,282 | $572,383 | 2.7 Years |
Aleea Stanford
Project Overview
NIAC/P3 Intern: Aleea Stanford
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Company Background
During the summer I participated in both ITAC and P3 assessments. Through the NITAC, I went on two assessments, one of which I was the lead student. In addition to NIAC assessments, I also worked at Universal Pure to provide recommendations to increase energy efficiency and reduce waste. At Universal Pure I focused on analyzing the current state of their dock door seals and how to increase energy efficiency. Universal Pure is a multifaceted company providing cold storage, high pressure processing, air tempering, and many other services to a variety of customers.
Project Description
During the summer of 2024, Aleea Stanford, an NITAC intern from UNL, worked at Universal Pure in Lincoln, Nebraska to further assess their potential Pollution Prevention (P2) opportunities. This included examining dock doors seals, forklift battery charging practices, LED installation and identifying projects for future interns.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
Several pollution prevention recommendations were made to reduce their overall energy consumption. Some of these recommendations had lower energy savings, but had other benefits that would provide positive impacts to the company such as safety.
Results
The estimated savings and pollution prevention benefits can be found in Table 1 below.
Project | Annual Cost Savings | Annual Reductions | GHG Reductions (MTCO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Total NIAC Recommendations | $44,905 | 579,305 kWh | 277.9 |
3,235 therms | |||
Upgrade Forklift Batteries | $3,053 | 44,277 kWh | 42.7 |
Upgrade Dock Seals | $166 | 2,394 kWh | 2.3 |
LED Exit Signs | $272 | 3,153 kWh | 3.04 |
Total | $48,396 | – | 325.9 |
Austin Young
Project Overview
NIAC Intern: Austin Young
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska at Lincoln
Summer Activities
During the Summer, I participated in 4 NITAC assessments with a leading role on the third. The first assessment was an engine valve and gear manufacturer where I was tasked with lighting solutions along with another member. The second assessment was at a wood processing plant in rural NE in which I collected data on compressed air leaks using an acoustic imager. For my leading assessment, we visited a food cans manufacturer in Minnesota for which I did a utility analysis and put together the final report. My fourth and final assessment was at a healthcare facility in rural Nebraska. My special project was an educational introduction to the concept of electrical demand reduction.
Recommendations Description
On my first assessment, I wrote two ARs, which are energy assessment recommendations. The first was a recommendation to program VFD’s (Variable Frequency Drives) on the motors running a specific process that involved idling times for which the motos could save energy by running at less power. The other AR involved changing old exit signs to newer LED models. For the second assessment, I wrote a recommendation for the facility to lower its air compressor setpoint by 10 psi, reducing energy consumption. On my lead assessment, I suggested that the facility apply for a tax exemption for utility cost used directly in production, and to install cool-air intake near the compressor system. On the last assessment, I wrote an AR on replacing single-paned windows with more energy-efficient alternatives.
Assessment Recommendation (AR) | Annual Savings | Capital Investment | Simple Payback (Years) | ||
Resource (Unit/year) | GHG Reduction (MTCO2e/year) | Dollars ($/year) | |||
AR No. 1: Program VFD’s for Grinding Wheel Motors | 747,421 kWh | 317.7 | $26,160 | $15,000 | 0.6 years |
AR No. 2: Upgrade Facility Exit Signs | 4,415 kWh | 1.9 | $629 | $818 | 1.3 years |
AR No. 3: Lower Air Compressor Setpoint | 8,723 kWh | 3.7 | $350 | $160 | 0.5 years |
AR No. 4: Apply for Utility Tax Exemption | --- | --- | $37,140 | $3,000 | 0.1 years |
AR No. 5: Install Compressor Cool-Air Intake | 223,900 kWh | 95.2 | $15,700 | $4,600 | 0.3 years |
AR No. 6: Upgrade Energy- Inefficient Windows | 231.1 MMBtu | 12.2 | $1,454 | $16,000 | 11 years |
Totals | 984,459 kWh 231.1 MMBtu | 430.7 MTCO2e | $81,433/year | --- | --- |
Jenn Zuspan
Project Overview
Nebraska Industrial Assessment Center Intern: Jenn Zuspan
Major: Mechanical Engineering
School: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Summer Activities
During this summer, I participated in the assessment visit of 4 facilities as an analyst student. In addition, in some of the assessments I served as the equipment and safety coordinator in the assessment team. I served as the Lead Student for one of the assessment visits.
Recommendations Description
During these visits, I worked on the preparation of 4 ARs which are: replacing regular v-belts with cogged v-belts, removing an electrical meter no longer in use, and repair compressed air leaks for two assessments.
Pollution Prevention Benefits
All four recommendations can result in improvements in energy efficiency of the assessed facilities which will eventually have positive influences on pollution prevention by reducing the overall energy consumption and the produced emissions from the processes, like GHG emissions. The amount of pollution prevention benefits of the ARs are shown in Table 1.
Results
The table below summarizes the pollution prevention benefits:
AR | Annual Energy Savings (kWh/year) | Annual Cost Savings ($/year) | GHG Emission Reduction (MTCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Cogged V-belts | 66,182 | $4,634 | 28 |
Repair Compressed Air Leaks | 106,666 | $8,247 | 73 |
Repair Compressed Air Leaks | 634,637 | $25,385 | 277 |
Remove Unused Electricity Meter | – | $240 | – |
Total | 807,485 | $38,506 | 378 |